Donate to the Cause  

Most people complain about tolls at the servo, at the kitchen bench, or after opening another notice in the mail. This challenge is different. It is an attempt to put the question where it belongs, before the courts. If you have ever felt the system is too big to question, this is one way to help question it properly.

Support the Challenge

Some systems stay in place because no one pushes on them.

Toll roads have been part of everyday life for years. People pay, move on, and don’t look back.

But after the High Court decision in Vanderstock v Victoria, a question started to form.

What exactly are tolls… and are they as settled as we think?

That question is now being tested in the District Court of Queensland in a matter involving the Department of Transport and Main Roads Queensland.

Why Support Matters

Challenges like this take time, effort, and resources.

Most people don’t step forward, not because they don’t care, but because it’s too costly to carry alone.

Support helps keep the question alive long enough for it to be properly answered.

Where Contributions Go

Every contribution supports the real work required to take this matter forward, properly, and all the way.

  • Court filing fees and administrative costs

  • Legal research and preparation of arguments

  • Drafting pleadings, affidavits, and submissions

  • Barrister and legal advisory fees (as required)

  • Case management and ongoing procedural steps

  • Obtaining documents, records, and supporting evidence

  • Expert input where needed to strengthen the case

  • Travel and attendance costs for court proceedings

  • Appeals and escalation, including preparation for the High Court of Australia

  • Compliance with court rules, notices, and formal requirements

What’s required to carry the question from where it starts…
to where it has to be answered.

What’s needed to see it through, all the way to the High Court of Australia.

This website provides public commentary and campaign information. It is not legal advice. The legal arguments discussed are matters to be tested before the courts, and no outcome is guaranteed.